Grey Matter(s): Embracing the Publisher Within

Most foundations don’t think of themselves as publishers, yet many of them act as such – making information available by funding research and publications, or by authoring their own. And failing to think of these activities as publishing efforts has serious consequences for shared learning in the social sector.

The shift toward knowledge-sharing strategies and approaches that embrace new search technologies, the logic of open access and open source, and the realities of the Internet as a largely decentralized and dynamic selfpublishing space offers the possibility of coordinating publishing efforts, and possibly agreeing to the use of shared practices that can facilitate shared learning while acknowledging the independence of individual organizations.

While there are some common obstacles preventing foundations from moving toward shared systems and practices, there are also a number of publishing practices being widely adopted that together address most of those obstacles and represent a set of shared practices around which the social sector might coalesce and coordinate.


Go to Resource


Content Partner: The Foundation Review


Content Partner Website

http://www.thefoundationreview.org


How and/or when is it best to use this resource?:

Use this resource for information and insight into sharing knowledge with the field.


What are the main takeaways or key points from this resource?:

Field leaders have significant knowledge to share; use this resource to understand how work is published or shared with the field.


Publication/Event Date:

The Foundation Review: Vol 7: Issue 2, Article 6


Is your resource available to the public or only your members?:

Public


Authors(s):

Lisa Brooks, B.A. and Gabriela Fitz, M.A.


Tags:



Categories:

Field/Sector Learning and Evaluation 
Legal Issues, Foundations, and Nonprofits
Online Publication

Leave a Reply