Grey Matter(s): Embracing the Publisher Within

Sign up for a free account to save resources for later or login.

Most foundations don’t think of themselves as publishers, yet many of them act as such – making information available by funding research and publications, or by authoring their own. And failing to think of these activities as publishing efforts has serious consequences for shared learning in the social sector.

The shift toward knowledge-sharing strategies and approaches that embrace new search technologies, the logic of open access and open source, and the realities of the Internet as a largely decentralized and dynamic selfpublishing space offers the possibility of coordinating publishing efforts, and possibly agreeing to the use of shared practices that can facilitate shared learning while acknowledging the independence of individual organizations.

While there are some common obstacles preventing foundations from moving toward shared systems and practices, there are also a number of publishing practices being widely adopted that together address most of those obstacles and represent a set of shared practices around which the social sector might coalesce and coordinate.

Go to Resource

Content Partner: The Foundation Review

Content Partner Website

How and/or when is it best to use this resource?:

Use this resource for information and insight into sharing knowledge with the field.

What are the main takeaways or key points from this resource?:

Field leaders have significant knowledge to share; use this resource to understand how work is published or shared with the field.

Publication/Event Date:

The Foundation Review: Vol 7: Issue 2, Article 6

Is your resource available to the public or only your members?:



Lisa Brooks, B.A. and Gabriela Fitz, M.A.



Laws and Legal Issues
Field/Sector Learning and Evaluation 
Online Publication

Leave a Reply